Hi,
When I finish restructurizing of source tree - I'll open CVS. (I really don't know how I can remove subdir on sf.net :( ).
You can't directly move a subdir in the SF CVS. You put in a work order and request that the admins do it for you. I've had experience with this, and they will eventually get to it (it may take a few days or weeks).
Yes, exactly. SF CVS lacks of many administrating things, including moving/renaming files, deleting dirs, limiting access rights of developers, reversing commits etc. It was the main reason for me to move away from SF.
Good luck with your fork. And who knows? In the grand scheme of open source development, the main project may roll some of your better ideas into the main tree (like gcc & egcs). But did you HAVE to call in
Or even better, maybe the opensource evolution will apply and the 'small branch' will create a brand new way of video playing and will be the no.1 player in the near future. Don't forget, the same happened to avifile/mplayer, the first mplayer (avip part) based on some of the avifile sources stripped down to 'usable' things and extended by me with new demuxer and a-v sync code. Now who remember what is avifile? :)
MPlayerXP? I can't imagine that I'm the only person who thinks that refers to an MPlayer port to a certain other operating system. Agree. Anyway if Nick wants to make something very different (dropping away a-v code, demuxers, codecs and others etc) then it shouldn't be called MPlayer* at all. It may have positive marketing value now, but it will change to negative in the future...
What about XPMP ? would follow the long list of X[MPS]{3} strings :) (xmms,xmmp,xmps etc) A'rpi / Astral & ESP-team -- Developer of MPlayer, the Movie Player for Linux - http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu