Hello, On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 11:10:51AM -0800, Corey Hickey wrote: [...]
(a) Use my patch, which is already written and runs reasonably quickly. (b) Use the patches for reordering in each encoder/decoder, which are already written and run almost as quickly. (c) Leave the bug alone and hope it motivates someone to spend a lot of time making a better solution.
If anyone steps forward and says they'll try to implement your suggestions in the near future, then I have no objections to (c). Otherwise, I think we ought to apply what we have, since this is a user-visible bug that people ask about once in a while. I prefer (a), as I explained earlier, but I won't be militant about it you have good reasons to prefer (b).
Does anyone else have objections? I do dislike the significant added complexity for af.c of solution (a), though I did not check if it can be simplified. If it can't I'd prefer (b). Greetings, Reimar Döffinger