Update of /cvsroot/mplayer/main/DOCS In directory mplayer:/var/tmp.root/cvs-serv6307/DOCS Modified Files: faq.html gcc-2.96-3.0.html Log Message: "boycott cvs" MPlayer T-shirts available from your local MPlayer distributor Index: faq.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/mplayer/main/DOCS/faq.html,v retrieving revision 1.33 retrieving revision 1.34 diff -u -r1.33 -r1.34 --- faq.html 1 Nov 2001 13:25:57 -0000 1.33 +++ faq.html 8 Nov 2001 23:41:50 -0000 1.34 @@ -185,6 +185,15 @@ problem, you are careless enough to do such things. </TD><TR><TD COLSPAN=3> </TD><TR> +<TD></TD><TD VALIGN=top><FONT face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=2>Q:</TD><TD WIDTH=100%><B><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"> +Hmm, strange. When loading the mga_vid.o kernel module, I found this in the logs:<BR> +<CODE>Warning: loading mga_vid.o will taint the kernel: no license</CODE> +</B></TD><TR><TD></TD><TD VALIGN=top><FONT face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=2>A:</TD><TD><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"> +Dunno, downgrade kernel (newer have stupid licensing limitation), upgrade +<B>MPlayer</B> or something. +</TD><TR><TD COLSPAN=3> </TD><TR> + + <TD COLSPAN=3><B><A NAME=5.2><FONT face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=2>5.2. General questions</A></B> </TD><TR><TD COLSPAN=3> </TD><TR> Index: gcc-2.96-3.0.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/mplayer/main/DOCS/gcc-2.96-3.0.html,v retrieving revision 1.2 retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3 --- gcc-2.96-3.0.html 24 Oct 2001 02:55:08 -0000 1.2 +++ gcc-2.96-3.0.html 8 Nov 2001 23:41:50 -0000 1.3 @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ <P> No. You are wrong! Several projects (mainly which source contains high optimized inline asm code) -had problems with gcc 2.96. For example: avifile, MESA / DRI, ffmpeg. +had problems with gcc 2.96. For example: avifile, MESA / DRI, Wine, ffmpeg. But other projects already workarounded gcc bugs (changed code which triggered compiler bugs) so they work for now. </P>