On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 07:38:21PM +0900, Jorgen Lundman wrote :
I don't understand what you mean... I would prefer one UDF reading codebase.
Then I would put you down as someone supporting the extra UDF code. :)
Consider me as someone who would prefer UDF code to be splitted or at least being easier to integrate into another project (a header and a few .c)
Yes, I don't think it is a good idea for libbluray to use libdvdread, because of the reasons already said before.
That it has "DVD cruft" seems beneficial in some cases like when using libdvdnav, but I hear you about the crashes. That is another
Unfortunately, dvdnav/dvdread are one of the biggest sources of crashes of VLC (around 50k crashes/day); but the situation has improved dramatically lately :) There is also the question of the licence. Libbluray is LGPL, not the UDF code of dvdread. Best regards, -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734 Sent from my Electronic Device