12 Sep
2009
12 Sep
'09
10:01 p.m.
On 09/12/2009 02:24 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
Is a whole lot simpler but still feels suboptimal. I also don't know if handling the cell change is quite right here or if it wouldn't belong into dvdnav_scan_admap...
Allrightythen. Here's an update incorporating your suggestions. dvdnav_scan_admap didn't look like the right place for handling the cell boundary because it currently doesn't touch the cell information at all. In order to handle the boundary, it would have to replicate a lot of code that is already in dvdnav_sector_search. If that's what you want, I'm happy to do it. Just seems worse than the alternative.