[rtmpdump] [rfc] are there patches that have not been reviewed still sitting around?

[Jon V.]

Someone should just remove rtmpe from the source and fork the project on
github call it rtmp-lite Adobe shouldn't have anything to gripe about then.

Then back port the changes to here.  I don't know how to find it but I
think I have two patch requests.
On Aug 13, 2015 10:09 AM, "Howard Chu" <hyc at highlandsun.com> wrote:

> Andrew Stone wrote:
>
>> I realize that this reply is a bit late, but better late than never.
>>
>>  From a cursory glance through the mailing list, there appear to be ~8
>> patches
>> pending (from the past year), and some misc bug reports. I, for one, use
>> this
>> project on an almost daily-basis work, and have recently started diving
>> into
>> the code to fix issues I'm running into. Given how much I rely on it, I
>> would
>> volunteer myself as maintainer, though I'm not sure how everything works
>> with
>> git/hosting/etc around here. Also, since this project is very low traffic,
>> might it make tracking easier / simplify things if the project were to be
>> moved (or at least mirrored) on GitHub/Bitbucket/something else, where bug
>> reporting and patches can be maintained in contiguous threads? I'd be
>> curious
>> if this has been considered and rejected in the past.
>>
>
> Don't be stupid. This project used to be hosted on sourceforge and got
> shut down
> by Adobe's army of lawyers. The same would happen again on Github or any
> other
> well known host. Don't make suggestions without knowing the history of
> what's
> gone on before.
> _______________________________________________
> rtmpdump mailing list
> rtmpdump at mplayerhq.hu
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/rtmpdump
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/rtmpdump/attachments/20150822/1a241b09/attachment.html>