[rtmpdump] The Justin.tv problem

Kirill Zorin cyril.zorin at gmail.com
Thu Jul 21 18:00:54 CEST 2011


Right, I guess as long as our p value looks "sufficiently close" to the original, should be fine. Good stuff!

On 2011-07-21, at 11:57 AM, Antoine ... wrote:

> You're right, but I don't know how the number in p= is generated.
> I think that generating a random value will be better than avoiding this param.
> 
> Le 21/07/2011 17:50, Kirill Zorin a écrit :
>> 
>> Sure, although maybe it'll be better if we kept the request as close as possible (ideally identical) to the real Flash player's, to avoid providing an easy way to identify rtmpdump requests on the other end?
>> 
>> On 2011-07-21, at 11:39 AM, Antoine ... wrote:
>> 
>>> After testing, a value for the p parameter isn't needed, so that should work :
>>> http://usher.justin.tv/find/<live_channel_name>.xml?type=any&p=&group=&channel_subscription=
>>> 
>>> Le 21/07/2011 00:17, Antoine ... a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>> The UsherToken is a JSON string that can be found in this XML :
>>>> http://usher.justin.tv/find/<channel_name>.xml?type=any&p=<any_int_value_?>&group=&channel_subscription=
>>>> 
>>>> The raw string is just feed to NetStream.Authenticate.UsherToken.
>>>> 
>>>> Le 21/07/2011 00:06, Howard Chu a écrit :
>>>>> 
>>>>> Antoine ... wrote: 
>>>>>> It's joined with this post, I'll update the docs later. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just for my information, how is the value of the usherToken calculated? 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Le 20/07/2011 17:01, Kirill Zorin a écrit : 
>>>>>>> Yes please =) 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 2011-07-20, at 10:53 AM, Antoine ... wrote: 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It's done. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Do I have to post de diff here ? 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Le 19/07/2011 22:42, pnixte at gmail.com a écrit : 
>>>>>>>>> Yes, it is. 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 7/19/11, Antoine ...<toine512 at gmail.com>  wrote: 
>>>>>>>>>> Hello everyone, 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I'm currently adding the support of NetStream.Authenticate.UsherToken 
>>>>>>>>>> method for Justin.tv legacy servers in librtmp. 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Is that good for the project and according your philosophy ? 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> ~toine512 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtmpdump mailing list
>>> rtmpdump at mplayerhq.hu
>>> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/rtmpdump
>> 
>> 
>>  
>>  _______________________________________________
>> rtmpdump mailing list
>> rtmpdump at mplayerhq.hu
>> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/rtmpdump
> _______________________________________________
> rtmpdump mailing list
> rtmpdump at mplayerhq.hu
> https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/rtmpdump

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/rtmpdump/attachments/20110721/d494f62d/attachment.html>


More information about the rtmpdump mailing list