[NUT-devel] [nut]: r636 - docs/nut.txt

[Måns Rullgård]

Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 08:11:58PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> michael <subversion at mplayerhq.hu> writes:
>> 
>> > Author: michael
>> > Date: Wed Feb 13 20:26:30 2008
>> > New Revision: 636
>> >
>> > Log:
>> > maybe better?
>> >
>> > Modified:
>> >    docs/nut.txt
>> >
>> > Modified: docs/nut.txt
>> > ==============================================================================
>> > --- docs/nut.txt	(original)
>> > +++ docs/nut.txt	Wed Feb 13 20:26:30 2008
>> > @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ single codec frame. A muxer MUST NOT sto
>> >  codec frame per NUT frame.
>> >  For RAW audio up to 4096 samples shall be considered 1 codec frame, the actual
>> >  number of samples MAY vary between NUT frames.
>> > -For RAW video a single frame shall be 1 codec frame.
>> > +For RAW video a single picture shall be 1 codec frame.
>> 
>> That doesn't make sense to me.  Do you mean something like "For raw
>> video one NUT frame shall contain exactly one video picture"?
>
> yes
>
> And it does make sense if you consider the previous rule:
> A muxer MUST NOT store anything except exactly 1 single
> codec frame per NUT frame.
>
> The sentance about RAW video just clarifies what a codec frame is.

In that case, "For raw video a codec frame is one video picture" or
similar seems more natural.  In English, definitions begin with the
entity being defined, followed by the explanation.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mans at mansr.com