[NUT-devel] [nut]: r604 - docs/nutissues.txt
dalias at aerifal.cx
Tue Feb 12 19:17:50 CET 2008
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:01:04AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > +Also it is inefficient for very small frames, AMR-NB for example has 6-32
> > > +bytes per frame.
> > I don't think anyone really cares that much about efficiency when
> > storing shit codecs in NUT. Obviously any good codec will use large
> > frame sizes or compression will not be good.
> Somebody correct me if I am wrong, but I think AMR currently is the best
> quality speech codec...
No, PCM is the best quality speech codec. :) :) :)
AMR is good for shit-quality applications like telephone, but not for
anything where you want the audio to actually be recognizable.
More information about the NUT-devel