[NUT-devel] Broadcasting nuts [PATCH]

[Måns Rullgård]

Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal.cx> writes:

> I've not been around today to reply to your email but just want to let
> you know I agree some things might not work as well as I had hoped,
> though I'm not sure I agree with your claims about what happens in
> this example either. I'd like to look into it more but if it turns out
> we cannot meet your requirements for broadcast optimality with my
> proposals I'll be willing to see what we can come up with to remedy
> that. I have an idea in mind for storing clock sync/buffering data
> which would be more flexible and less invasive than the proposals so

I'd hardly call Michael's proposal invasive.

> far, I think, but I'll wait to write about it til I'm not about to
> fall asleep.

I'd sure like to hear what you have in mind.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mans at mansr.com