[NUT-devel] revisions for nut-english.txt?

[Måns Rullgård]

Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal.cx> writes:

> No one's considering NUT as a replacement for .rar either because it's
> for a different purpose. Sadly MPEG-TS has an incestuous purpose,
> mixing multiple logical layers into one. That doesn't mean we should
> copy it.
>
> Even if we copied stupid MPEG-TS stuff in NUT, still no one would use
> it instead of MPEG-TS. They have lots of stupid legacy reasons for
> wanting backwards, ill-designed stuff from MPEG specs. Our target
> audience should not be people who lack any rational capabilities or
> else we have to make something lowered down to their intelligence
> level...

It's nice to see the old Rich Felker is back, and that he is still the
expert on everything he's never been near.

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mans at mansr.com