[NUT-devel] new NUT repository

[Diego Biurrun]

On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:46:48AM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:17:31AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 02:48:19PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:36:38PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > > I've created a new NUT repository that contains the old NUT repository
> > > > and the specification files (oggless-xiph-codecs.txt, nut.txt, mpcf.txt,
> > > > mncf.txt) each in a separate directory.
> > > > 
> > > > svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/
> > > > http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/nut.merged/
> > > > 
> > > > Make sure it works as expected.  If it does we can do away with the old
> > > > one and remove the specification files from the MPlayer repository.
> > > 
> > > Oded is happy with the repository, nobody else complained.  So if there
> > > are no further objections, I will remove the files from the MPlayer
> > > repository after the weekend.
> > 
> > Files removed.
> > 
> > I'm hearing no complaints about the new repository, Oded said he was
> > happy.  Unless I hear protests I will remove the old one and rename the
> > new one to 'nut' by the end of the week.
> > 
> > While we're at it..  There are only two committers (Oded and Alex) for
> > the NUT repository.  Is that on purpose or should the usual MPlayer or
> > FFmpeg crowd be allowed to commit?
> 
> well i guess i as main author of the nut spec should have commit access to
> it at minimum
> also i think "everyone" should have commit access ...

I've added the MPlayer committers.

> btw, i really think these svn repo moves and changes shouldnt be done at all
> now, simply becasue they cause work for everyone and svn (at least all repos
> where iam maintainer) will be changed to git (or less likely mercurial)
> IMO svn has reached the end of its usefullness ...

Disagree strongly, but I really have no interest in flaming about this
issue.

Diego