EOR (was: Re: [NUT-devel] a few things about nut.txt)
Ivo
ivop at euronet.nl
Fri Nov 24 21:26:00 CET 2006
On Friday 24 November 2006 19:34, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 06:37:33PM +0100, Ivo wrote:
> > + A muxer SHOULD use EOR frames for subtitle streams to mark large
> > periods
> > + where subtitles are absent.
>
> s/large//
Changed locally.
> > + EOR frames for non-subtitle streams are only valid at the end of
> > the + stream.
>
> It would be nice to have a note that they are syntactically valid but
> that they need not be interpreted for compliance with the current
> version of NUT and that processes generating NUT files MUST NOT write
> EOR for non-subtitle streams.
Perhaps:
EOR frames for non-subtitle streams are syntactically valid, but, except
for the last frame, they SHOULD be ignored by demuxers and MUST NOT be
written by muxers.
Or:
EOR frames for non-subtitle streams MUST NOT be written by muxers and SHOULD
be ignored by demuxers, except for the last frame.
?
--Ivo
More information about the NUT-devel
mailing list