[NUT-devel] info packets/frames

[Rich Felker]

On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 06:40:47AM +0200, Oded Shimon wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:08:41AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > [...]
> 
> Rich and I vote for throwing the tables alltogether, they are unnecessary 
> complexity in reducing size of already redundant data... Michael, what's 
> your vote on this?

Well this is my preference. In the absence of that, I'm willing to
have a small list of essential key names, but I'd strongly prefer only
including the essential, universal ones if the list will be locked
forever, rather than arbitrarily including whatever we think of right
now..

Rich