[MPlayer-users] svn.mplayerhq.hu: Connection refused

[Alexander Beregalov]

2010/1/24 Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger at gmx.de>:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 06:32:50PM +0300, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
>> 2010/1/24 Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger at gmx.de>:
>> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 04:38:39PM +0300, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
>> >> 2010/1/23 Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger at gmx.de>:
>> >> > On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 07:47:04PM +0300, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
>> >> >> $ svn checkout svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk mplayer
>> >> >> svn: Can't connect to host 'svn.mplayerhq.hu': Connection refused
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Is it down?
>> >> >
>> >> > It is working for me.
>> >>
>> >> Still does not work for me (2-3 days).
>> >>
>> >> IP 192.168.1.3.53120 > 213.144.138.186.3690: Flags [S], seq
>> >> 2943957182, win 5840, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 424080368 ecr
>> >> 0,nop,wscale 6], length 0
>> >> IP 213.144.138.186 > 192.168.1.3: ICMP 213.144.138.186 tcp port 3690
>> >> unreachable, length 68
>> >>
>> >> My IP is 91.78.20.166 now.
>> >>
>> >> I can reach it from another subnet.
>> >> It looks like IP filtering somewhere.
>> >
>> > Going by "never assign to malice..." it's just as likely that someone
>> > messed up their routing tables.
>> > Try traceroute and if you get useful results ask whoever is the last
>> > stop.
>> Routing is correct.
>>
>>  8  r1fra1.core.init7.net (80.81.192.67)  67 ms  60 ms  71 ms
>>  9  r1zur1.core.init7.net (77.109.128.249)  66 ms
>> r1fra2.core.init7.net (77.109.128.138)  60 ms  59 ms
>> 10  r1bas1.core.init7.net (77.109.128.134)  70 ms  64 ms  125 ms
>> 11  r1zur2.core.init7.net (77.109.128.129)  104 ms  69 ms  96 ms
>> 12  natsuki.mplayerhq.hu (213.144.138.186)  72 ms  70 ms  82 ms
>
> Then at least ICMP is not blocked.
>
>> > If it doesn't work, ask your internet provider, you are probably paying them
>> > and they can't just start providing only half the internet or you should
>> > consider just paying them half as well.
>>
>> Perhaps your provider has blocked these home adsl subnets after for
>> example massive spam?
>
> Blocking the SVN port for that hardly makes sense.
> Can you connect via ftp, http or smtp ports?
> (21, 80, 25)

Starting Nmap 5.10BETA1 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2010-01-24 18:43 MSK
Nmap scan report for natsuki.mplayerhq.hu (213.144.138.186)
Host is up (0.078s latency).
All 1000 scanned ports on natsuki.mplayerhq.hu (213.144.138.186) are filtered

Hm, it has changed. Few minutes ago svn was closed, not filtered.
It means there is no answer.
Yes, ICMP is reachable.

ping 213.144.138.186 :

IP 192.168.1.3 > 213.144.138.186: ICMP echo request, id 61499, seq 1, length 64
IP 213.144.138.186 > 192.168.1.3: ICMP 213.144.138.186 protocol 1 port
41434 unreachable, length 92
IP 192.168.1.3 > 213.144.138.186: ICMP echo request, id 61499, seq 2, length 64
IP 213.144.138.186 > 192.168.1.3: ICMP 213.144.138.186 protocol 1 port
28100 unreachable, length 92
IP 192.168.1.3 > 213.144.138.186: ICMP echo request, id 61499, seq 3, length 64
IP 213.144.138.186 > 192.168.1.3: ICMP 213.144.138.186 protocol 1 port
23990 unreachable, length 92