[MPlayer-users] one-pass encoding results better than two-pass
Matyas Sustik
mplayer.list at sustik.com
Mon Jan 5 06:34:03 CET 2009
I have encoded a 1080i broadcast using the following filters:
pp=ci,crop=1904:1072:10:0,hqdn3d=4:3:6,softskip,scale=952:536:0:0:0.00:0.60,harddup
with bitrate set to 3000. On a 20 seconds long sample the one pass encoding
produced a file with 8703945 bytes and quality:
x264 [info]: SSIM Mean Y:0.9805128
x264 [info]: PSNR Mean Y:44.861 U:48.798 V:49.399 Avg:45.849 Global:45.537
kb/s:3259.63
The two pass encoding (same filter and x264enc options) produced a file with
9437678 bytes.
x264 [info]: SSIM Mean Y:0.9803121
x264 [info]: PSNR Mean Y:44.632 U:48.669 V:49.280 Avg:45.642 Global:45.489
kb/s:3068.16
So it would seem from this experiment that the one pass encoding produced a
smaller file with the same or better quality. (Visual inspection cannot tell
them apart.) Am I doing something wrong? This is not what one would expect,
right? Should I rerun this with other samples? The current one had a lot of
fast moving actions.
Matyas
-
Every hardware eventually breaks. Every software eventually works.
More information about the MPlayer-users
mailing list