[MPlayer-users] Interleaving artefacts when capturing from TV
Kichigai Mentat
kichigai at comcast.net
Wed Mar 22 05:34:19 CET 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mar 21, 2006, at 17.53, wim delvaux wrote:
> If I capture a PAL movie in 640-480 according to the docs I could get
> interleaving artifacts ,,, and I do
>
> Again according to the docs this could require too excessive
> bandwidth and
> hence CPU usage. I think I get this because my audio video is out
> of sync
> (probably because of high CPU usage)
>
> I want do get rid of these artefacts yet capture in a high resolution.
> The docs suggest to use a deinterlacing filter (-vf pp=lb) However
> I wonder
> if that is enough to reduce the CPU usage or if I should just
> reduce the
> capture size. If I need to reduce the size what would be a
> reasonable size
> for PAL and how do I specify it (width=...;Height=... ? or what ?)
Deinterlacing won't reduce your CPU usage. It'll increase it. For the
moment, your best option is to post-process the file. Capture it with
a high quality, low resource codec (High-bitrate MPEG-2, some
configurations of MJPEG, DV/DVpro through libDV (though that isn't
perfect), feel free to experiment with them) and then go over it
again with a good deinterlacing filter (there's a whole long thread
devoted to which deinterlacer was the best, somewhere in the mailing
list archives) and compress it.
Either that, or drop your capture resolution. 320x240 usually does a
bit better. Depending on your application, a hardware encoder, like
the Hauppauge PVR-150 might be worth the investment for you.
>
> Thanx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFEINPMwAwn3hu8KxcRAnamAJ42SGl49g03OBDI5TdejSs51k8lNgCfXTeY
Cc60PFrsa29O143Ddj4W1+U=
=m6xz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the MPlayer-users
mailing list