[MPlayer-users] lavc vs. xvid (and improving lavc quality)

rcooley rcooley at spamcop.net
Sun Jun 6 14:06:05 CEST 2004


On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 13:33:10 +0200
matthias-wieser at t-online.de (Matthias Wieser) wrote:

> ??? It doesn't matter if you use 1 or 2-pass encoding if the problem
> lies at the strategy how mencoder distributes the availabele bits
> within one frame.

That is not the problem here.


> You may try to explain how to do 2-pass encoding with TV-sources.

First you save it to a lossless format, and then you do two-pass
encoding on the resulting file.

I never said you should do 2-pass on a TV source, just that
single-pass can't give very good results without very high bitrates.

> denoise3d doesn't lower quality of tv broadcasts significantly. It 
> improves compressibility.

Yes, denoise does lower picture quality plenty.  It improves
compressibility, but so does scaling-down the video to 1/8th it's
oroginal size...

> > I'm sure there are more than one 
> > that would improve video for you.
> 
> Yes of course (if you donate a new CPU).

Who said you need a new CPU?  They aren't all CPU-intensive options,
quite a lot of them don't affect CPU time at all, they just change how
lavc allocates the bits it has to work with.




More information about the MPlayer-users mailing list