[MPlayer-users] Conflict between -vf and -vop suboption parsing

ephemeron at softhome.net ephemeron at softhome.net
Tue May 6 06:09:19 CEST 2003

Which is obsoleted, -vf or -vop?  Both options work with my cvs
version of MPlayer. However, -vop ${SCALE},${CROP} works like -vf
${CROP},${SCALE}.  For example, -vop ${CROP},${SCALE} will bail
out if the "cropped area is out of original".  To produce a
similar "crash" with -vf I have to reverse the suboptions to -vf
${SCALE},${CROP}.  Shouldn't the two options produce the same
results?  Shouldn't mplayer at least parse their suboptions in
the same order?  Better yet, why not do away with the other
option?  It's confusing!

More information about the MPlayer-users mailing list