[MPlayer-users] Re: Quicktime: "No 'moov' atom could be found"

[Jonathan Rogers]

rcooley wrote:
> Moritz Bunkus wrote:
> 
>> Ogg does not have the potential to become a general container. It simply
>> lacks a lot of important things. Most important: there are no specs!
> 
> First of all, it has a lot of potential, because it is so flexible that 
> it can do just about anything, without everything it can do, having been 
> defined ahead of time.  That gives it more potential, not less IMHO. 
> Sure, there's no specs yes, but it's just a matter of somebody writing 
> them.  All this software is open source.  Pretty easy to look up how 
> everything is done, even without specs.

I'm keeping an open mind about what Ogg might be useful for in the 
future, but Moritz does know a bit about the current state of affairs.

<URL:http://www.bunkus.org/videotools/ogmtools/>

Jonathan Rogers