[MPlayer-users] Re: Soundcard Survey [was: DVD sound sync]
Jeffrey Hammel
jhammel at EECS.Berkeley.EDU
Wed Jun 12 19:02:01 CEST 2002
> Every DVD I played with mplayer so far needed a delay of about -200 ms
> for good A/V sync.
>
> CPU is only a Celeron433, but from the CPU load and the fact that
> mplayer doesn't drop frames, I'd say this is fast enough.
>
> Soundcard is a Soundblaster PCI64 (Ensoniq ES1371). Same Problem with
> OSS (both kernel drivers and commercial) and ALSA (both 0.5 and 0.9).
>
> So my question to all of you who claim perfect A/V sync with DVD
> playback: What's your CPU? Which soundcard/driver combination dou you use?
>
> -Michael
>
I have not no problem "per say" (see below) with A/V sync and have used
two different HW sets with different SW configurations.
On my Athlon 1800, ATI Radeon 7000, Audigy (+ OSS drivers:
opensource.creative.com) I have two linux distros:
*With RH 7.2, I must use -framedrop to get good results (yes, even with
this beefy HW! Don't know why.) Not many frames are dropped, anyway, but
still strange. Possibly could have used -delay instead. Never tested and
now this box is out for repairs. Compiler was gcc 3.1
*With Drock 1.6 (www.rocklinux.org) everything works perfect. No dropped
frames, perfect A/V sync. Compiler was gcc 2.95.3.
Can give more specs on each distro if desired.
On my PIII laptop, ~650MHz, PCI Cirrus Logic CrystalClear CS (module name
cs46xx BTW), RH7.1 (book version). I DLed the .rpm s for MPlayer 0.9pre4,
so perhaps its unfair to compare binary and source versions. At any rate,
things work fine with no frame-drop and good A/V sync. Admittedly, I have
800x600 res on this system and 1600x1200 on the Athlon.
In both cases I use fullscreen with the xv driver, as this seems to give
the best results.
Jeff Hammel
More information about the MPlayer-users
mailing list