[MPlayer-users] Bug: 0.60 Doesn't compile
Nix N. Nix
nix at go-nix.ca
Fri Jan 11 00:10:01 CET 2002
On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 17:58, Horváth István wrote:
> [Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read DOCS/bugreports.html]
> > Alright, what about 3.1 ? I saw RPMs for version 3.1 of gcc on
> > RawHide. How does 3.1 hold up in the Grand Scheme of Compiler Things
> > (versus 2.95.x, it seems) ?
> > > ok? :)))
> actually i am not a developer, but i can tell that the redhat is not the
> best choice(IMHO), like it's 2.96.x gcc series problem was.
> i recomend you to use debian, because it is not include gcc compilers,
> such like 2.96 or 3.0.x to default.
> but if you install for example gcc-3.0.x you should see that it is 'PRE'
> version, so it is not tested, and completed!!
> but if you choose redhat, you should keep gcc-2.95.x, until everybody will
> say, that the gcc-3.x.x is stable! but i think, it is so far away!
Well, I am downloading the source RPM for gcc-2.95 and I'm going to
compile it. It's interesting to note, however, that I'll be compiling
2.95 using 2.96. Ironic ?
> best regards
> RTFM!!! http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu/DOCS
> Search: http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu/cgi-bin/htsearch
More information about the MPlayer-users