[MPlayer-users] Re: (flame) FAQ entry concerning gcc 2.96

[Dan Hollis]

On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Arpi wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Gabucino wrote:
> > > > Anyway you guys seem to be way too stubborn on the issue. Can't you just
> > > > accept that gcc 2.96 is not buggier than gcc 3.x? Or is this one of these
> > > I completely agree. gcc 3.x is even more buggier than 2.96 :)
> > > You miss the point. gcc 2.96 is buggier than _gcc 2.95_ .
> > Does mplayer generate compiler warning for gcc 3.x then?
> hmm good idea.
> what about a favoutite-drinks-of-developers quiz in ./configure? :)

Should probably generate warnings for gcc 2.92 as well?

Arpi, is 2.96-85 clean? It's quite easy to check for this version and
reject others (as it's quite easy to check for gcc 3.x)

-Dan
-- 
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]