[MPlayer-G2-dev] dual licensing try 2

[Gabucino]

rsnel at cube.dyndns.org wrote:
> > It helps the developers.
> It helps the developers doing bad things
It helps the developers avoiding potentially harmful and time+money consuming
lawsuits.


> Suppose MPlayer is licensed to some 'pay-per-view' company, and that
> company is given the right to distribute modified versions of MPlayer
> to their users without giving the right to distribute modified versions
So what? They already do/can do it right now! MPlayer's source is open,
and everyone feels free to steal, in case you haven't noticed.

Would _you_ support a lawsuit?

-- 
Gabucino
MPlayer Core Team
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-g2-dev/attachments/20040223/21301f1d/attachment.pgp>