[MPlayer-G2-dev] dual licensing

[Gabucino]

Attila Kinali wrote:
> Now the discussion whether it should be gpl/bsd or gpl/lgpl
> isn't one at all (fortnunately or unfortunately ?). We already
> use a lot of third party gpl/lgpl code which we cannot relicense
> under bsd, thus we have to stick with gpl/lgpl.
Let's continue this thread on mplayer-legal mailing list IMHO.

-- 
Gabucino
MPlayer Core Team
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-g2-dev/attachments/20040222/5a8cf407/attachment.pgp>