[MPlayer-G2-dev] Re: About final cfg.h (config layer 0 discussion)
Arpi
arpi at thot.banki.hu
Mon May 26 16:43:18 CEST 2003
Hi,
> Variant from first version with 'vqscale' as only member of group:
>
> config_t const_vq_group[]={
> {"vqscale", &vqscale, CONF_TYPE_INT, CONF_RANGE, 1, 31, NULL, ""},
> {NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL, NULL}
> }
>
> config_t var_vq_group[]={
> {"vqmin", &vqmin, CONF_TYPE_INT, CONF_RANGE, 1, 31, NULL, "minimun quant"},
> {"vqmax", &vqmin, CONF_TYPE_INT, CONF_RANGE, 1, 31, NULL, "maximum quant"},
> .........
> {NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL, NULL}
> }
>
> config_t vq_groups[]={
> {"", NULL, CONF_TYPE_GROUP, 0, 0, 0, const_vq_group, "constant quantizer"},
> {"", NULL, CONF_TYPE_GROUP, 0, 0, 0, var_vq_group, "variable quantizer"},
> {NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0, NULL, NULL}
> }
>
> .....
> {"", NULL, CONF_TYPE_GROUP, 0, 0, 0, vq_groups, "*"},
> .....
>
> May be that way it's more clear?
i understand but it doesn't look nice.
> >> It seems even simpler than previous version and allows even more that two
> >> group choises (and still no changes for CLI syntax). :)
>
> >hmm, i don't understand this version.
>
> >i understood the first version, but it has a big bug: it doesn't store
> >which group was selected by teh user.
>
> Second version containing one more level of CONF_TYPE_GROUP that
> could have option->p as int* to indicate which subgroup was selected.
how? where do you store the value to be stored at int* ? serial number of
list member? min/max value as in flags?
hey this is messy, this is not what we want.
btw we could extend the config_select_list_t to include a config_t*, so
we could "link" config entries to select-list elements. it looks cleaner.
> First version cannot have that and I don't see how first version could
> have more that two choices. We cannot use CONF_TYPE_SELECT here because
> that grouping must be transparent for CLI (to preserve syntax).
CLI also should follow "grouping", ie it shouldn't allow(*) vqmin/vqmax
settings when constant qscale mode is selected...
(*): maybe we should think 'like' insteda of 'allow', it it could warn user
of wrong syntax but don't fail... or even better: this 'allow-some-errors
policy' should be optional, something like gcc's -pedantic switch.
A'rpi / Astral & ESP-team
--
Developer of MPlayer G2, the Movie Framework for all - http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu
More information about the MPlayer-G2-dev
mailing list