[MPlayer-DOCS] r20878 - trunk/DOCS/xml/en/video.xml

[Diego Biurrun]

On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:25:24PM +0100, Torinthiel wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:47:39AM +0100, torinthiel wrote:
> > Log:
> > [cosmetics]
> >  - visual separation of sect* tags
> > 
> > --- trunk/DOCS/xml/en/video.xml	(original)
> > +++ trunk/DOCS/xml/en/video.xml	Mon Nov 13 11:47:38 2006
> > @@ -85,8 +85,13 @@
> >  </para>
> >  </sect1>
> >  
> > +
> > +<!-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -->
> > +
> > +
> >  <sect1 id="output-trad">
> >  <title>Video outputs for traditional video cards</title>
> > +
> >  <sect2 id="xv">
> >  <title>Xv</title>
> >  
> > @@ -807,6 +816,7 @@
> >  </note>
> >  </sect2>
> >  
> > +<!-- ********** -->
> >  
> >  <sect2 id="mga_vid">
> >  <title>Matrox framebuffer (mga_vid)</title>
> > @@ -1507,8 +1527,10 @@
> >  </para>
> >  </sect3>
> >  
> > +
> >  <sect3 id="vidix-mga">
> >  <title>Matrox cards</title>
> > +
> >  <para>
> >  Matrox G200, G400, G450 and G550 have been reported to work.
> >  </para>
> 
> Any opinions on this? Any reasons I should/should not do something
> similar to other XML files (time permitting of course)?
> And the issue with start-tag not being in the same column as end-tag as
> well?

I've been planning to apply some sort of coding style to the (XML)
documentation since forever.  It seems that lazyness has always gotten
the better of me so far.  If you are motivated to do it, you are most
welcome.

Diego