[MPlayer-DOCS] CVS: main/DOCS/man/en mplayer.1,1.1008,1.1009

[Torinthiel]

On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 11:03:14AM +0200, Reimar Döffinger CVS wrote:
> 
> CVS change done by Reimar Döffinger CVS
> 
> Update of /cvsroot/mplayer/main/DOCS/man/en
> In directory mail:/var2/tmp/cvs-serv15289/DOCS/man/en
> 
> Modified Files:
> 	mplayer.1 
> Log Message:
> support lenght-quoting of strings in subopt parser.
> 
> 
> Index: mplayer.1
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/mplayer/main/DOCS/man/en/mplayer.1,v
> retrieving revision 1.1008
> retrieving revision 1.1009
> diff -u -r1.1008 -r1.1009
> --- mplayer.1	15 Jun 2005 08:14:55 -0000	1.1008
> +++ mplayer.1	16 Jun 2005 09:03:11 -0000	1.1009
> @@ -383,6 +383,22 @@
>  If an option is marked as (XXX only), it will only work in combination with
>  the XXX option or if XXX is compiled in.
>  .PP
> +.I NOTE:
> +.PD 0
> +.RSs

I don't like the formatting of this at all. The PD 0 RSs pair causes the
text to be indented as hell, is this really necessary and intended?

> +The suboption parser (used for example for -ao pcm suboptions) supports
> +a special kind of string-escaping intended for use with external GUIs.
> +.PP
> +It has the following format:
> +.PP
> +%n%string_of_lenght_n
> +.PP

.br should be enough here, as used in most other parts of documentation.
And IMHO .I EXAMPLE: in place of the line below as well.
Should I fix?

> +Usage example:
> +.PP

Torinthiel

-- 
 Waclaw "Torinthiel" Schiller       GG#: 542916, 3073512
   torinthiel(at)megapolis(dot)pl
   gpg: 0906A2CE fpr: EE3E DFB4 C4D6 E22E 8999  D714 7CEB CDDC 0906 A2CE
 "No classmates may be used during this examination"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-docs/attachments/20050619/a6f3a4d4/attachment.pgp>