[MPlayer-DOCS] [RFC] Binary packaging guidelines, second draft
D Richard Felker III
dalias at aerifal.cx
Fri Nov 19 20:16:30 CET 2004
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 04:20:25AM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is the second draft, with most of your suggestions included.
>
> Outstanding issues (correct me if I omitted anything):
>
> * whether or not to require the following features:
> - DGA
do not require.
> - FAAD (internal or shared?)
require one or the other but don't specify which.
> - GUI
do not require. require it to be a separate package, if included at
all, imo. :)
> - XAnim codec support
i don't care.
> * audio/video output
> - fbdev
> - JPEG/PNG/TGA
> - (X)MGA
> - OSS
> - SDL
SDL should not be required or recommended. it's just a poor wrapper to
other vo's already supported, and has lots of bugs.
> - tdfxfb
> - (c/x)vidix
> - X11/Xvideo/DGA
>
> * codecs
> - FAAD(internal)
> - libavcodec(internal)
> - native codecs (libmpeg2/liba52/mp3lib)
> - Ogg Vorbis support
> - RealPlayer codecs support
> - Win32/VfW/DShow/QT codecs support
> - XAnim codecs support
>
> * general:
> - default font
> - default skin (Blue)
> - FreeType fonts support
> - GUI
> - HTML documentation
> - large file support
> - man page(s)
>
> * input/demuxers:
> - DVD(mpdvdkit2)
> - streaming
> - Matroska(internal)
> - (S)VCD
> - tv(v4l/v4l2)
>
> Including other features, like LIVE.COM streaming or JACK support, is
> acceptable. They SHOULD, however, be build-time configurable, with default
> build configuration containing the above set.
huh, build-time?! we're talking binary packages...
rich
More information about the MPlayer-DOCS
mailing list