[MPlayer-DOCS] users-vs-developers.xml {PATCH]

[Torinthiel]

On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 09:11:32PM +0100, Torinthiel wrote:
> When talking about binary packages (line 142) it is said that you can
> pass -enable-runtime-... Ok, but the wording there IMHO suggests that
> you should pass this at compile time, whether it is passed to configure.
> And one line after there are 2 comma-connected sentences that IMHO don't
> link together. Unless you add 'so' ;)
> Ok to change?
> 
> Also some links (http://www.bero.org/gcc296.html - other side of story
> http://www.nvnews.net/forum/showthread.php?s=fda5725bc2151e29453b2da3bd5d2930&threadid=14306 
> - nVidia Linux Forum and first 4 links about joe barr - the ones on linuxworld)
> are not working anymore
Managed to find 3 of 4 missing linuxnews links.
> 
> Torinthiel
Torinthiel


-- 
 Waclaw "Torinthiel" Schiller       GG#: 542916, 3075312
   torinthiel(at)wp(dot)pl
   gpg: B06901F1 fpr: FAA3 559F CAE9 34DE CDC8  7346 2B6E 39F2 B069 01F1
 "No classmates may be used during this examination"
-------------- next part --------------
Index: users-vs-dev.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvsroot/mplayer-pl/DOCS/xml/en/users-vs-dev.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 users-vs-dev.xml
--- users-vs-dev.xml	22 Sep 2003 11:36:43 -0000	1.7
+++ users-vs-dev.xml	26 Oct 2003 21:07:08 -0000
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
 
 <para>
 Joe Barr became infamous by writing a less than favorable
-<ulink url="http://www.linuxworld.com/site-stories/2001/1214.mplayer.html">
+<ulink url="http://www.linuxworld.com/story/32880.htm">
 <application>MPlayer</application> review</ulink>.
 He found <application>MPlayer</application> hard to install, but then
 again he is not very fond of
@@ -186,9 +186,9 @@
 He also concluded that the developers were unfriendly and the documentation
 incomplete and insulting. You be the judge.
 He went on to mention <application>MPlayer</application> negatively in his
-<ulink url="http://www.linuxworld.com/site-stories/2001/1227.predictions.html">10 Linux predictions for 2002</ulink>.
+<ulink url="http://www.linuxworld.com/story/32887.htm">10 Linux predictions for 2002</ulink>.
 In a followup
-<ulink url="http://www.linuxworld.com/site-stories/2002/0125.xine.html">review of xine</ulink>
+<ulink url="http://www.linuxworld.com/story/32716.htm">review of xine</ulink>
 he continued stirring up controversy. Ironically at the end of that article
 he quotes his exchange with Günter Bartsch, the original author of <application>xine</application>,
 that perfectly summarizes the whole situation:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-docs/attachments/20031026/865d1e96/attachment.pgp>