[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] libbs2b audio filter

[Nico Sabbi]

On Thursday 26 March 2009 11:40:10 The Wanderer wrote:

> If this is the case, then so be it. There's nothing that says that
> either of the changes *has* to be made.
>
> Setting up a competing fork, and then pretending that it *isn't*
> competing and that development will eventually transition over to
> it simply because it is inherently superior, seems to me to be
> arrogant to the point of being offensive - and it seems to me that
> that is exactly what you have done here. There's nothing wrong with
> a personal fork of the code, but the attitude I see in the
> assumption that your fork will become the mainline and in comments
> like "some old developers ... try to keep maintaining ... [in] SVN"
> rubs me very much the wrong way.


from my point of view he just has to decide how he will call his code. 
Mplayer is something else than his git tree and I don't remember 
reading any votation about the switchover, thus I have to conclude 
that the current svn is and will be the official mplayer, however its 
current state of affairs.