[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] A/V sync improvement for TV streams

Laurent laurent.aml at gmail.com
Mon Oct 27 23:23:13 CET 2008


On 10/27/08, Uoti Urpala <uoti.urpala at pp1.inet.fi> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 10:16 -0400, Laurent wrote:
> > I agree with Michael, for all points.
>
> I doubt whether you have enough information to form an informed opinion.
My opinion was within the scope of this thread.

> > I have no interrest in working in this GIT fork, nor in any other's fork.
> > I've been using MPlayer for years and never heard of this GIT
> > repository before joining the mailing lists. 99% of MPlayer users
> > would be in this case.
>
> The tree is relatively new and hasn't been publicized so that is not
> surprising. However that doesn't mean things will stay that way.
>
> > My interrest is to use my time (and reviewer's) for this whole community.
> >
> > If your patch would have been applied upstream before, it might have
> > spare hours of troubleshooting to a few of us (and definitely me, at
> > least).
>
> You'd have equally spared it if the git tree had been more widely
> publicized and you'd been aware of it. I think it would not be a good
> idea to suddenly replace the current svn with the contents of the git
> tree or to try moving parts of it piece by piece (that'd waste more than
> a few hours). A better approach is to make sure the git tree is usable
> for most people and then start migrating from svn to it. One way you can
> help with that is to test it on Windows.

Here, I don't have enough information to form an opinion. At least,
not enough to consider yet your fork over the official SVN trunk.
My current impression is that lots of guys still work on the SVN trunk
and that your fork benefits from their work, while I am not sure of
the converse. As you know, I am quite new here.

If my patches could be committed to the SVN repository, I would appreciate.

Thanks,

Laurent



More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list