[MPlayer-dev-eng] The new Makefiles
Ivan Kalvachev
ikalvachev at gmail.com
Sat Apr 12 15:20:34 CEST 2008
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Alban Bedel <albeu at free.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> so the new flat build system is underway. Sadly IMHO it have a few
> shortcomings and there is some things that I think we should discuss
> here before going any further.
>
> The most important point IMHO, is do we really get rid of the .a or not?
> On the plus side I only see a few rule less in the Makefile. On the
> minus side the whole source list is required for any tool using the lib
> in question.
>
> Then there is the problem that now all sources are grouped together. It
> completely prevent any sane build system for the tools. Even if we drop
> the .a we need to keep a source list for each lib. Anything else is
> just too inflexible.
>
> If we keep separate lists we might as well put them in $LIB/Makefile
> and support building from the lib's dir. The latter is easy to achieve
> with some include. And still having separate Makefiles would make
> things easier for newcomers than having to dive in a 5000 lines
> Makefile.
>
> As an example, attached is a Makefile for osdep that can be included
> from the main Makefile or used "alone". Obviously it's just a draft as
> we still need to settle the above issues, and perhaps some more.
There is something else I wonder about the flat build system.
Does it link objects faster that it links static libraries? Does it
need less memory for linking?
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list