[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] Make mp3lib SIMD optimizations work on AMD64, Part 5

[Zuxy Meng]

Hi,

2007/5/26, Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger at stud.uni-karlsruhe.de>:
> Hello,
> On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 12:07:32AM +0800, Zuxy Meng wrote:
> > 2007/5/25, Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger at stud.uni-karlsruhe.de>:
> > > Why should it be treated different depending on whether there is a
> > > function body directly below it or not?
> >
> > Because the standard says so (C99 6.7.5.3.14) :-)
> > An identifier list declares only the identifiers of the parameters of
> > the function. An empty list in a function declarator that is part of a
> > definition of that function specifies that the function has no
> > parameters. The empty list in a function declarator that is not part
> > of a definition of that function specifies that no information about
> > the number or types of the parameters is supplied.
>
> Maybe that really is the case for C99 (though I doubt it, and this
> section says nothing about when a compiler will create warning or
> errors).
> Anyway, he following code does compile with gcc, so not putting void
> there is a very bad idea:
>
> > static int test() {
> >  return 0;
> > }
> >
> > int main(int argc, char **argv) {
> >   return test(0);
> > }

Got it. Thanks!
-- 
Zuxy
Beauty is truth,
While truth is beauty.
PGP KeyID: E8555ED6