[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] Refreshed OS/2 Patches

KO Myung-Hun komh at chollian.net
Mon Jul 30 09:12:06 CEST 2007


Hi/2.

Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 11:00:52PM +0900, KO Myung-Hun wrote:
>   
>> Attila Kinali wrote:
>>     
>>> On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:41:00 +0900
>>> KO Myung-Hun <komh at chollian.net> wrote:
>>>   
>>> And finally you should split the kva and dart patches
>>> (rule of thumb: things that do not depend on each other should
>>> be in different patches).
>>>       
>> I have questions.
>>
>> configure script has patches for both kva and dart. In this case, should 
>> I split configure script into kva and dart, respectively ?
>>
>> And in the case of common parts, what should I do ? That is, configure 
>> script has common code for both kva and dart. Should I include those 
>> codes to both kva and dart pathces ?
>>     
>
> Patches should be independent.  If I were to apply your vo driver patch,
> it would not work because the build system part is missing.
>
> So yes, you should not split your patch by file, but by logical entity.
> This means that the vo/ao driver patches should come with separate
> changes to configure.
>
>   

Ok. Now I seems to understand your review policy a little.

> There is no common kva and dart code in your configure patch.
>
>   

I think the codes to add '-lmmpm2' for kva or dart are common. Am I wrong ?

>>> Other than that, someone with an understanding of libao
>>> and libvo should check those patches.
>>>       
>> Hmm... Who are they ?
>>
>> Anyway it's very difficult to merge patches to official repository.
>>     
>
> Try FFmpeg :)  Or libdvdcss, libdvdread, libmpeg2 ...
>
>   

-- 
KO Myung-Hun

Using Mozilla SeaMonkey 1.1.2
Under OS/2 Warp 4 for Korean with FixPak #15
On AMD ThunderBird 750 MHz with 512 MB RAM

Korean OS/2 User Community : http://www.ecomstation.co.kr





More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list