native vs libavformat demuxers (was: Re: [MPlayer-dev-eng] [RFC][PATCH] audio and video framers)
michaelni at gmx.at
Mon Feb 26 01:55:45 CET 2007
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 01:03:48AM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 12:21:44AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > I have a feeling that most of the libavformat demuxers except for
> > RealMedia are probably better than our native ones. Did anybody compare
> > them in detail and/or run benchmarks?
> No, though once in a while there tends to be one that works with one but
> not the other, in both directions.
if lavf where used by default (for a few more formats) the quality of
lavf demuxers would improve alot there arent that many bugreports which
arent fixed, its rather the lack of bugreports
> Primary candidates for removal are IMO demux_nuv.c (possibly with
> corresponding decoder) and demux_mpc.c definitely with corresponding
> decoder, because it does not work with ffmpeg decoder and when muxed
> into AVI will create a format that (although I find it more sane) is
> very different from what lavf creates and not playable with ffmpeg
> decoder either.
if ffmpeg is insane then dont hesitate to send a patch to fix that
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Opposition brings concord. Out of discord comes the fairest harmony.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng