diego at biurrun.de
Thu Feb 22 09:31:14 CET 2007
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 04:16:39AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:04:55PM +0100, Roberto Togni wrote:
> > On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 08:55:39 +0200
> > Uoti Urpala <uoti.urpala at pp1.inet.fi> wrote:
> > > The GUI is currently broken after the mplayer.c changes. I'm hoping that
> > > someone else will fix it. If no one does within a couple of days I'll
> > > hack it enough to make it compile.
> > >
> > [...]
> > Not only the GUI...
> > On IRC me (and others, as I understand by reading the list) asked you
> > to post a patch and give the GUI devels some time to prepare a patch
> > (at least the windows GUI is actively mantained). That would have also
> > enabled other people to test the patch before committing it.
> > Also the fear that other thins may be broken after such big patch were
> > true.
> > I understand that maintaining big patches for some time requires some
> > effort, but any other developer does it too. And most of the file you
> > touched does not change often.
> > As a final problem, the commit was wrong: it moved a lot of code to new
> > files without using svn cp, and reformatted it too (you should know
> > that MPlayer devs are quite sensitive to cosmetic changes).
> > I haven't checked the technical details of the patch yet, so I can't
> > comment on them now.
> > I'm for reverting this asap as long as it's easy to do it (before people
> > start to commit hacks to fix compilation), and recommit it properly only
> > when all major issues are fixed.
> as i already said on cvslog i also very strongly vote for reverting, that
> makes 3 votes for reversal (ivan, you and me) and no votes against it,
> i dont count uau because his oppinion is highly biased as it is his commit
I think I can fix this without reversal. I'll look into it later today.
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng