[MPlayer-dev-eng] Add demux_nut to libmpdemux
Oded Shimon
ods15 at ods15.dyndns.org
Fri Sep 15 16:06:30 CEST 2006
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 03:48:37PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 04:21:55PM +0300, Oded Shimon wrote:
> > uhh... -lnut is necessary. If I had written a configure part, it would
> > have done 'NUT_LIB=-lnut'.. Obviously now this is redundant, but it's a
> > placeholder...
>
> Then pass --with-extralibs, but don't clutter the Makefile needlessly.
uhh, isn't this the standard way of using libraries for modules? I
honestly don't know, I'm asking.
> > > Below is a collection of long lines from demux_nut.c, I'd appreciate if
> > > you could make them look non-ugly on 80 char terminals. This makes me
> > > think that 8 character indentation is excessive...
> >
> > Good thing you're not in charge of NUT repo :) many lines there are ~150
> > chars long...
>
> Ugh, are you trying to compete with the Gui/ subdirectory?
My console is 160 chars, naturally my code lines end up same width...
> > Like I said, I just wanted to move out demux_nut.c from NUT repo, it's not
> > exactly production ready.. Though it does work :)
>
> Well, when is it going to be finally production ready then. If you
> don't intend to finish it, how serious are you about NUT?
I underestimated demux_nut.c ... It's pretty good quality now that I
re-checked it, at very least better than some/most parts of MPlayer...
Only a few very minor FIXME's in the code, mostly related to displaying
the current time position in the file...
> Seriously, NUT is supposedly frozen, but libnut does not even have an
> installation routine? I don't know if I should laugh or cry ...
"libnut" is a grand total of 2 source files and 2 header files.., I
consider even the Makefile redundant, let alone an installation routine...
BTW, I haven't done any hacking on NUT since the spec was frozen, so I'm
still in the "pre-release" era :)
- ods15
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list