Hi, On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:31:39PM +0200, Reimar D?ffinger wrote: > So, would you prefer the attached patch that changes xInc_mask to > uin16_t, a seperate patch that changes xInc_mask or should xInc_mask > just be left as it is now? Applied this patch. Greetings, Reimar Döffinger