[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] Drop support for gcc-2.95

Jiang Hong netex at 163.com
Mon Jul 10 08:35:37 CEST 2006


Hi,

gcc-4.1.1 even doesn't compile lame-3.96 correctly with -O2 option.

      ERRORF(gfc,"This is a fatal error.  It has several possible causes:");
      ERRORF(gfc,"90%  LAME compiled with buggy version of gcc using advanced optimizations");
      ERRORF(gfc," 9%  Your system is overclocked");
      ERRORF(gfc," 1%  bug in LAME encoding library");

> 
> Attila Kinali wrote:
> > 
> > You forget another argument: 2.95 has fewer bugs than 3.x or 4.x,
> > thus whenever someone suspects a gcc bug, first thing they
> > do is to compile it with 2.95. 
> 
> gcc-4.1.1 has fewer bugs than gcc-2.95, supports more arches, has less
> issues with asm constraints and so on...
> 
> > 
> > IMHO it's no big deal to keep 2.95 support. Just need
> > the awarenes that some C99 constructs are not allowed.
> > Thus i'm against to remove support for it.
> > 
> 
> I'd require C89 variable declaration since the code is simpler to follow
> that way.
> 
> lu
> 
> -- 
> 
> Luca Barbato
> 
> Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list
> MPlayer-dev-eng at mplayerhq.hu
> http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-dev-eng


-- 
Jiang Hong <netex at 163.com>






More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list