[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] Drop support for gcc-2.95
Jiang Hong
netex at 163.com
Mon Jul 10 08:35:37 CEST 2006
Hi,
gcc-4.1.1 even doesn't compile lame-3.96 correctly with -O2 option.
ERRORF(gfc,"This is a fatal error. It has several possible causes:");
ERRORF(gfc,"90% LAME compiled with buggy version of gcc using advanced optimizations");
ERRORF(gfc," 9% Your system is overclocked");
ERRORF(gfc," 1% bug in LAME encoding library");
>
> Attila Kinali wrote:
> >
> > You forget another argument: 2.95 has fewer bugs than 3.x or 4.x,
> > thus whenever someone suspects a gcc bug, first thing they
> > do is to compile it with 2.95.
>
> gcc-4.1.1 has fewer bugs than gcc-2.95, supports more arches, has less
> issues with asm constraints and so on...
>
> >
> > IMHO it's no big deal to keep 2.95 support. Just need
> > the awarenes that some C99 constructs are not allowed.
> > Thus i'm against to remove support for it.
> >
>
> I'd require C89 variable declaration since the code is simpler to follow
> that way.
>
> lu
>
> --
>
> Luca Barbato
>
> Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
>
> _______________________________________________
> MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list
> MPlayer-dev-eng at mplayerhq.hu
> http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-dev-eng
--
Jiang Hong <netex at 163.com>
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list