[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] ve_lavc cosmetics
Diego Biurrun
diego at biurrun.de
Tue Feb 14 01:35:49 CET 2006
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:31:29PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 01:03:43AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:39:21AM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 03:51:51PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > The idea that whitespace should conform to a single 'coding style'
> > > > rule is IMO very misguided. The purpose of whitespace is to break the
> > > > logical units (logical in terms of how humans think about it, not how
> > > > the machine things) up in a way that makes them easier to read. This
> > > > depends on the semantics of the code, not the syntax.
> > >
> > > yes, i fully agree
> > > here are a few more examples which would be literally obfuscated if
> > > they where are automatically reformated
> >
> > I don't think I was expressing myself very clearly..
> >
> > I was not proposing to add spaces regardless of context, just to be
> > consistent when adding spaces around operators like
> >
> > var1=value;
> > var2 = value;
>
> And to be clear, I was explicitly saying that consistency in this area
> is NOT desirable.
I don't think we actually disagree, but I'm too tired to continue to
argue and I'm apparently not making myself understood...
Diego
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list