[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] safe lzo decompression should be used

[Erik Slagter]

On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 00:50 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:

<topic mode="off">

> No worry, I wasn't particularly flaming you. I just know that if this
> smime stuff becomes more popular it will massively bloat my mail
> archive. 180 bytes for pgp signature is not so bad,

Something like this -> ;-)

> but this stupid
> smime thing is 4k and, looking at the data, it seems to mostly be
> advertisements for the company who issued the key, or something like
> that..

LOL!

That's because the signing chain travels through two level of Thawte.
Don't know why they do that. Maybe it wouldn't be that bad to include
some sort of compression in smime certs.

I like my smime cert better than pgp though, because it requires
face-to-face verification and is backed by thawte with an "official" CA.

</topic>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-dev-eng/attachments/20060415/b78b5cd0/attachment.pgp>