[MPlayer-dev-eng] Re: [LONG] new results & bugs report

Michael Niedermayer michaelni at gmx.at
Mon Jun 14 13:36:14 CEST 2004


Hi

On Monday 14 June 2004 09:07, Romain Dolbeau wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>>More interesting: "vme=4" has 3528 results, only 72 short
> >>>of the 3600 one would have after removing the 1/4 "mbd=1 & qprd".
> >>>Guess vme=1 is more of a problem (2106 results). With vme=4,
> >>>those 72 failures happened "*dia=2 & *cmp=1 & qpel". Is that
> >>>an invalid combination ?
> >>>
> >>>(I haven't checked where "vme=1" fails).
> >>
> >>Ignore it, vme=1 is sucky and broken.
> >
> > vme 0-3 are indeed sucky and broken
>
> OK. So that's only 72 failures not accounted for,
> all the "*dia=2 & *cmp=1 & qpel" cases. Is that
> another incompatibility ?
no, send bugreport (exact command line options for one which fails)

>
> BTW, what about mplayer checking for option sanity
> on input ? Lije barfing for qprd is mbd!=2, or
> using cbp w/o trell (this one is documented).
libavcodec does check and returns an error, config() in ve_lavc.c should also 
return with an error but it seems mplayer ignores this and random things 
happen next, like a segfault

-- 
Michael
level[i]= get_vlc(); i+=get_vlc();		(violates patent EP0266049)
median(mv[y-1][x], mv[y][x-1], mv[y+1][x+1]);	(violates patent #5,905,535)
buf[i]= qp - buf[i-1];				(violates patent #?)
for more examples, see http://mplayerhq.hu/~michael/patent.html
stop it, see http://petition.eurolinux.org & http://petition.ffii.org/eubsa/en




More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list