[MPlayer-dev-eng] Re: [PATCH PROPOSAL] -vf option, or soon no more scanf in the vf's

Alban Bedel albeu at free.fr
Sun Mar 16 20:02:15 CET 2003


Hi Andriy N. Gritsenko,

on Sun, 16 Mar 2003 19:05:11 +0200 you wrote:

>     Hi, Alban Bedel!
> 
> Sometime (on Friday, March 14 at 19:45) I've received something...
> >I wrote the needed stuff to have something better to configure the
> >vf's. That is the vf will be able to just define their options and get
> >a pre-filed struct at open.
> [.......]
> 
>     Albeu, I just send you a letter. May be I'm wrong but I think I have
> to write here too. I don't like your way for two reasons: 1) it changes
> current syntax;
It just extand it, the old syntax still work and you can mix the 2.
> 2) I don't like void* pointers. Beside, I've already
> done big part of patch for '-ovc' change. With all said here only way to
> do it is to implement syntax '-ovc lavc:option:....' for command line
> parameter and 'ovc:lavc = option:....' for config statement. All that
> stuff need to implement configurable ve_* and vf_*. But way I do it is
> incompatible with yours since I need more flexible and safe way, sorry.
Ok, but can you be more precise. What should be more flexible and
safer. Pls just say a bit more.
> So, people, please, be patient and wait some days for my patch - I need
> to check it all thoroughly before sending. That patch will do all stuff
> of Albeu and even more! Without changing a syntax (I really hate too
> complex syntax, sorry)! :)
Cool, send it asap.
	Albeu


More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list