[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] Autoconfiguration for XML DOCS building system

Diego Biurrun diego at biurrun.de
Mon Jun 16 00:55:15 CEST 2003


On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 08:24:18PM +0400, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> ?? ?? 14.06.2003, ?? 20:28, Diego Biurrun ??????????:
> But: I noticed that it could end up in such situation: Saxon processor &
>  _java="". Attached contains quick fix.
> Also I noticed, that final gij-3.3 from Debian sid can't work with
> installed on my box saxon-6.4.4.jar (It worked with gij-3.2). So I
> disabled it.

OK, I'll use your updated version then, if there are no further
comments/improvements.

> Also added .cvsignore

Yes, I was going to add one with the commit.

> > otherwise I will commit this during the next days.
> OK. But don't forget to remove 3 generated files before commit
> (you included them in patch, so that's why I'm mentioning it).

Thanks.

> Also, be aware, that "make test" is broken now, so I removed them from
> "make help".

Hmm, I think make test does not make much sense anymore anyway.  The
configure script has taken its place.  I will remove it.

> [from another letter]
> > Hmm, another thought..  Should we put this into the main configure
> instead?
> I asked this in this list before starting this work.
> Here is answer from gabucino at mplayerhq.hu:
> IMHO this shit shouldn't be in configure.
> 
> So, that's why I put it into new script.

I think I beg to differ ;-)

I believe this belongs in configure.  What do you others think?

But it's not such a big deal, we can always add it to the main configure
later on.

> Also, I made some 'timing' (
> real/user times from "time make distclean all", using various
> processors.):
> XSLTproc:               3m30.435s/3m6.500s
> Saxon (SUN J2SE1.4):    3m34.360s/2m36.790s
> Jade:                   0m50.425s/0m43.210s
> OpenJade:               6m0.737s/4m55.710s
> 
> So we must look into better support of Jade (Currently It can't be made
> default one, because it doesn't use .xsl styling. Maybe we must look
> into writing proper (equivalent to html-common.xsl) .dsl .

Yes, sounds interesting indeed.  Any volunteers? ;-)

Diego



More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list