[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] vo-control method suggestion
Arpi
arpi at thot.banki.hu
Thu Feb 7 17:38:25 CET 2002
Hi,
> +#define VOCTRL_SEEK 1
> +/* Query Video Accelerated Architecture information.
> + * params:
> + * vaa: address of struct to be filled.
> + * (Note: driver should memset it to ZERO if it doesn't support vaa.)
> +*/
hmm. look at control() in libao2, or libvo2 drafts.
you just break the main point of this function: extendibility without
modifying all the drivers.
implementation of conyrol() should be like this:
int control(int cmd, void* param){
switch(cmd){
case VOCTRL_QUERY_XYZ:
...
...
case ...
}
return VOCTRL_NOTIMPL;
}
it shouldn't memset zero to struct it doesn't even know and so on.
if it returns VOCTRL_NOTIMPL it means it doesn't know this extension - teh
caller should accept this and memset to zero if required.
> + int (*control)(int request, ...);
ehh. is this "..." usefull enough? Isn't a simple void* better?
(pointing to struct depending on cmd)
I don't like to play with VA_ARGS stuff...
A'rpi / Astral & ESP-team
--
"I don't RTFM? Wow. What's the meaning of this? It's new for me."
-- Martin Baum, a tipical MPlayer user...
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list