[MPlayer-cygwin] Change priority to realtime in windows
Joey Parrish
joey at nicewarrior.org
Tue Oct 5 22:15:51 CEST 2004
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:33:22PM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> >IMHO, "time critical" is helpful, but not so aggressive that it even
> >needs to be optional. I do this in my packages. With this priority,
> >MPlayer gets preference over other normal apps, but will still defer CPU
> >time to critical OS tasks.
>
> It gave problems for some users nevertheless. And I already posted a
> patch that does something like this once, but nobody cared to make it an
> option.
> I'm also not sure if THREAD_PRIORITY_TIME_CRITICAL exists on e.g. win98
> can someone check? And last but not least I'm not too sure if raising
> thread priority will help enough - I might test if I ever boot into
> Windows again ;-)
I believe that time critical doesn't exist on win98. It'll still run on
win98, that statement will just fail. But again, I think that realtime
priority is a bad idea.
--Joey
--
"The Hell Law says that Hell is reserved exclusively for them that believe
in it. Further, the lowest Rung in Hell is reserved for them that believe
in it on the supposition that they'll go there if they don't."
HBT; The Gospel According to Fred, 3:1
More information about the MPlayer-cygwin
mailing list