[MPlayer-cvslog] r26411 - trunk/libmpdemux/demuxer.c

Reimar Döffinger Reimar.Doeffinger at stud.uni-karlsruhe.de
Sat May 31 23:06:31 CEST 2008


On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 11:47:13PM +0300, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
> On 5/31/08, Reimar Döffinger <Reimar.Doeffinger at stud.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:08:29PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 08:51:17PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >> > On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 05:23:32PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >> > > Reimar never spoke in favor of removing Uoti.
> >> >
> >> > Not litterally i think, but iam pretty sure he said something to the
> >> > effect of
> >> > him being in favor of uoti being removed if theres no other solution
> >> > being
> >> > found ...
> >>
> >> .. i think .. pretty sure .. something to the effect of ..
> >>
> >> He did not say anything like that literally, nor implied.  I was the one
> >> to talk to him personally, not you.  Let Reimar speak for himself, do not
> >> make guesses or assumptions about his opinions.
> >
> > Well, I guess about them myself. I did say and mean something to the
> > effect that loosing one good developer might be worth it if it means
> > and is the only way of getting peace and everyone else work more productive
> > again - but unfortunately making that happen requires far more.
> > Also note that I did say this a somewhat long time ago.
> 
> Well, make decision and give clear answer.
> 
> Do you want Uoti to remain as developer or you want him to be removed.
> It is your call.

No, as I tried to say there is no point at all now, for all I can tell.
And I object to the term "want". I considered it as a kind of
quick-and-dirty solution, in addition at a point where I seriously
considered if someone might be acting in genuine bad faith.

Greetings,
Reimar Döffinger



More information about the MPlayer-cvslog mailing list