[MPlayer-cvslog] r26897 - in trunk: AUTHORS DOCS/tech/MAINTAINERS DOCS/tech/encoding-guide.txt DOCS/tech/encoding-tips.txt configure etc/codecs.conf libmpcodecs/vd_xvid4.c libmpcodecs/ve_xvid4.c
Diego Biurrun
diego at biurrun.de
Thu May 29 23:25:06 CEST 2008
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 07:29:39PM +0200, Aurelien Jacobs wrote:
> Diego Biurrun wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:21:13AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 01:58:59AM +0300, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
> > > > On 5/28/08, Paul Arthur <flowerysong00 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > On 2008-05-27, The Wanderer <inverseparadox at comcast.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> diego wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Log: cosmetics: XviD --> Xvid
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Did we hash this out at some point and conclude that that was the
> > > > >> correct spelling? I have been of the impression that "XviD" is
> > > > >> correct, for much the same reasons that "DivX" is correct.
> > > > >
> > > > > xvid.org seems to invariably capitalise it as 'Xvid'. Though I wasn't
> > > > > able to track down an official announcement in my cursory search, it
> > > > > appears that they changed it from 'XviD' sometime near the end of 2006.
> > > >
> > > > Xvid Solutions is formed by split of xvid developers, they inherited
> > > > XviD codec, but it is not further developed by them. They are working
> > > > on closed H.264 codec. When (and if) they release it, they can call it
> > > > Xvid 2.0.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On a question in FreeNode #xvid
> > > > <iive> ... what is the correct name of xvid - Xvid or XviD ?
> > > > <prunedtree> i'd say XviD, as it's DivX reversed
> > > > <prunedtree> and it looks much better in a logo
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > In the current cvs and the last release that was done after the change
> > > > of the website, all strings inside (documentation, headers and source)
> > > > refer to the codec as XviD.
> > > >
> > > > On that ground I see no reason why this change should have ever been done.
> > > > I'm reverting it.
> > >
> > > http://www.xvid.org/ disagrees, as does Wikipedia and and Google.
> > >
> > > Not to mention that we have already settled on the Xvid spelling in most
> > > of the documentation a long time ago:
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > r20876 | kraymer | 2006-11-13 09:53:20 +0100 (Mon, 13 Nov 2006) | 2 lines
> > > Changed paths:
> > > M /trunk/DOCS/man/en/mplayer.1
> > > M /trunk/DOCS/xml/en/codecs.xml
> > > M /trunk/DOCS/xml/en/encoding-guide.xml
> > > M /trunk/DOCS/xml/en/faq.xml
> > > M /trunk/DOCS/xml/en/mencoder.xml
> > >
> > > rename: XviD -> Xvid
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > I'm glad to see you doing some useful work. Restoring inconsistency was
> > > badly needed. Thanks a bundle.
> >
> > Oh, forgot to say: This is a clear violation of policy section II.9.
>
> Policy ?? Which policy ? I thought you had just abolished any kind of policy !
> (or at least refused to enforce it, which is basically the same)
>
> Did I misunderstood something ? I would be glad to hear a clear statement
> about this.
To clarify: I find it very ironic that Ivan insists on following the
policy to the letter and now so flagrantly violates it.
Diego
More information about the MPlayer-cvslog
mailing list