[MPlayer-cvslog] r26411 - trunk/libmpdemux/demuxer.c
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni at gmx.at
Sat May 10 18:40:11 CEST 2008
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 05:51:58PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 05:21:59PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 04:27:50PM +0300, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Reimar Döffinger
> > > <Reimar.Doeffinger at stud.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 01:38:06PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > >> diego 1038 504 1542
> > > >> reimar 690 246 936
> > > >> voroshil 312 8 320
> > > >> nico 212 43 255
> > > >> benjamin 144 32 176
> > > >> ulion 153 13 166
> > > >> eugeni 106 56 162
> > > >> uoti 99 20 119
> > >
> > > Reimar, looking at these numbers, I'd say that you are de-facto project leader.
> > > Diego is not coder and none of his commits changes the way MPlayer
> > > works. He is doing a lot of refactoring and cosmetics.
> > >
> > > Reimar, please take the Project Leader role and resolve the situation
> > > in the way you like it.
> >
> > yes, seconded, and my emphasis is on _resolve_. Not the "playing deaf" diego
>
> I will write up a statement/explanation before the weekend draws to a
thanks
> close. I have no time right now because I am meeting friends in a few
> minutes.
>
> > He once wanted to close ivans ffmpegs svn account
>
> You are not giving a correct representation of the facts here. It was
> Mans that proposed closing Ivan's FFmpeg account, I just seconded that
> notion. You may, and you are certainly free to, disagree with me, but I
> don't consider committing non-free code to be in the same class of issue
> as removing parentheses in a commit (wrongly) labeled "indent". You
> were also not around when Mans and I discussed with a stubborn Ivan on
> IRC.
Unless my brain rotted away, you wanted ivans svn access closed long
before he commited the code you consider non free.
From what i remember this was at the time uotis ffmpeg svn account was
closed.
You kept his account open after i pointed out that he is maintainer of
XVMC in ffmpeg IIRC
but note this is what i remember i did not search for the mails from
back then to verify all fine details.
>
> But mind you, this issue is long forgotten, forgiven even, so let us
> please not start a subflamewar out of this.
>
> > (that was around the time when he also wanted to
> > close all doc maintainers access to ffmpeg svn)
>
> This is also not a correct retelling of the facts. In the beginning
> commit access to FFmpeg and MPlayer were the same thing. That meant
> that each and every FFmpeg committer had full commit access to MPlayer
> and vice versa. After the first Uoti incident, you wanted that changed
> and I implemented it, according to your instructions.
>
> I suggested removing the MPlayer translator which have never done any
> code changes from the list of FFmpeg committers. None of them had ever
> committed to FFmpeg (nor have they since) and I doubt they were or are
> really aware of the fact that they can. Their commit accounts were
> never intended for FFmpeg.
>
> You wanted to keep them, so I left them in the list of committers.
yes all true
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
I know you won't believe me, but the highest form of Human Excellence is
to question oneself and others. -- Socrates
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-cvslog/attachments/20080510/5f907831/attachment.pgp>
More information about the MPlayer-cvslog
mailing list